Responding to the Ten Predictable & Recurring Excuses of No Kill Opponents

http://www.nokilladvocacycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/tactics.pdf

Responding to the Ten Predictable & Recurring Excuses of No Kill Opponents (click the link to read the rational responses to the following excuses)


“We can never be No Kill as long as the public is irresponsible.”
“There are simply too many animals and not enough homes forthem all.”
“No Kill causes animal suffering.”
“Open admission shelters cannot be NoKill.
“We can’t be No Kill because we can’t adopt out animals who might injure someone, especially a child.”
“No Kill means animals living their entire lives in cages.”
“We have all the No Kill programs but it just doesn’t work.”
“No Killis very expensive. Our community cannot afford it.”
“No Kill advocates are radical extremists.”


This document is from the US so statistically is incorrect for Australia HOWEVER the points it raises are valid for this nation.